Law of Non-Contradiction

Evolution Violates the LAW  OF  NON  CONTRADICTION

Definition of Law: (from Wikipedia)

In logic, the Law of Non-Contradiction is the second of the so-called four classic laws of thought. The oldest statement of the law is that contradictory statements cannot both at the same time be true, e.g. the two propositions “A is B” and “A is not B” are mutually exclusive. This is the statement of the law given by Aristotle. It takes no account of the truth of either proposition; if one is true, the other is not; one of the two must be false.

Law of Logic’s Position:

Something cannot be “A” and “not A” in the same relationship and at the same time.  A dining room chair is not a “table” at dinner time.  But dining room chair is a “table” for my grandson as he works on his Lego creation in the dining room.  The chair can be a chair and a table BUT in a different time and relationship. 

As this law applies to the Day 1 of the Theory of Evolution,  you can’t have nothing and then have something at the beginning of time and the universe.  How did something come out of nothing?

As for Day 4, a cell came out of and from chemicals.  The Law of Non-Contradiction says that the chemicals were either life or non-life.  The chemicals cannot be both.

Looking at Day 5 of the Theory of Evolution, evolutionist say birds came from reptiles.  The reptile laid an eggto either its own kind or a primitive bird with a different DNA.  One or the other. 

Something cannot be “A” (living cell) and “not-A” (chemicals or non-living cell) at the same time and in the same relationship.

Choose Between:

Scientist have not found any violation of this law up until the Theory of Evolution was proposed.  Choose between the Law of Non-Contradiction or the Theory of Evolution.

Conclusion: 

 I must be intellectually honest and choose the most reasonable explanation.  This means I choose the Law and put the Theory of Evolution back into the “hypothesis” category.